Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
gutzmank
ParticipantIt wasn’t legal in Virginia., or in several other southern states. I can’t say that it was illegal in all.
gutzmank
ParticipantThat’s correct. Yet, in the controversy over the Alien & Sedition Acts, Republicans such as Jefferson and Madison insisted that the Alien Friends Act was unconstitutional because it was up to the states to decide who immigrated until 1808.
gutzmank
ParticipantGov. Deal of Georgia signed the Compact for America legislation the other day. 33 states to go.
gutzmank
ParticipantI like WHERE WAS PATRICK HENRY ON THE 29TH OF MAY? Take a look.
March 22, 2014 at 11:39 pm in reply to: Abolition of Slavery in Political Platforms before 1860 #15344gutzmank
ParticipantYou’re welcome.
gutzmank
ParticipantYou’re welcome.
gutzmank
ParticipantThis week, the lower house of the Alaska Legislature passed the CFA legislation. It joined one house of the Arizona Legislature. Georgia’s legislature has passed the legislation and sent it to Gov. Deal for his signature. This thing is on a roll. If your state legislature isn’t one of those three, I urge you to follow up with your rep(‘s)/senator(s).
gutzmank
ParticipantThe North exported far fewer products than the South. >70% of American exports were southern agricultural goods–although they were generally carried in northern or British ships.
March 16, 2014 at 5:02 pm in reply to: Abolition of Slavery in Political Platforms before 1860 #15342gutzmank
ParticipantThey denied wanting to end slavery. Their position was “No More Slave Territories.”
The Liberty Party opposed slavery. No other did.
gutzmank
ParticipantSorry, but I didn’t see it.
It is odd that the judge was put up against several professional experts in this field. Stacked deck?
gutzmank
ParticipantThey validated his general claim. Besides that, virtually everyone who was blackballed was an actual Communist.
Take a look at M. Stanton Evans’ McCarthy biography. Evans is an outstanding writer (and raconteur), and he has the goods.
gutzmank
ParticipantAlexander Werth’s RUSSIA AT WAR, 1941-45 Is excellent. The description of the Siege of Leningrad is unforgettable.
gutzmank
ParticipantAssuming, arguendo, that the argument is right so far as it goes:
“Worked” in what sense?
No one disputes that with enough borrowing–that is, transferring wealth from the future to the present–one can jolt current consumption. Is this rocket science?
Is there ever a point at which these people conclude that it’s immoral to pile more debt on posterity so that we can benefit today? (NB: rhetorical question)
gutzmank
ParticipantSince secession is impossible now, unlike in Speaker Macon’s time, the Compact for America initiative is our best option. Let me know what you think after you read my review of Levin’s book and the associated links.
Yes, I do have a hard time believing that anyone sincerely thinks that an open-ended drafting convention would yield any results at all, let alone good results.
gutzmank
ParticipantIt means that direct taxes are to be apportioned among the states according to their populations.
Yes, the Federal Government does now essentially ignore this provision in regard to several types of taxation.
-
AuthorPosts