Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
woodsParticipant
I don’t think so, but members here may have other ideas. It makes sense to do U.S. history before the Constitution course, I suppose, and the Keynes course might be easier if you have the economic fundamentals down.
woodsParticipantYou might consider posting this question to the economics forum, to be sure Professor Herbener sees it.
woodsParticipantThe main argument, as I recall, involved alleged corruption in the election of senators by the state legislatures. Thank goodness our senators have become such upstanding people now!
August 15, 2013 at 12:42 am in reply to: The Church and the Market and the Catechism of the Catholic Church #20037woodsParticipantI don’t know if this will help or not, but here’s an article of mine that may be relevant: http://www.catholicity.com/commentary/woods/03525.html
woodsParticipantFeser’s book Aquinas is more advanced but also useful. Richard Swinburne is also good. But again, this is not easy reading.
woodsParticipantIt might be worth posting this question to the economics forum as well, to see what Professor Herbener thinks.
woodsParticipantThis question belongs in the US History to 1877 forum, but you and I discussed this via email; I sent you this link:
woodsParticipantCan you remind me about the thread? Then I could make recommendations.
woodsParticipantWhat is their evidence for this claim? Who in that age was keeping those kinds of records — not just the numbers involved in the quintiles themselves, but also the movement of specific individuals from one quintile to another?
woodsParticipantThis is more a question for our Contact page; the questions here are more of an academic nature. Two weeks in advance of the subscription renewal you receive an email indicating that the renewal is coming up, and at the $99 rate. The coupons are generally for first-time members. But we give away free gifts to people who renew, as we indicate in the email.
woodsParticipantThat’s probably not the most generous way of characterizing the site owner, is it?
July 6, 2013 at 10:44 am in reply to: Is Social Security Mandatory For Private Sector Persons? #16036woodsParticipantI guess I’m not following. Where is the language that would indicate it is optional? An amendment was proposed making it optional, and FDR angrily rejected it.
woodsParticipantI’ve been trying to ask around but haven’t been able to get much for you. All I can share are my own experiences; I’ve used the Brinkley texts and Tindall and Shi. Tindall and Shi was less p.c. when it was just Tindall. Pretty conventional text, as is Brinkley’s, but they will get you the establishment narrative, which is what the College Board wants.
woodsParticipantAre you finding this to be the case for all of them?
woodsParticipantMatt and I have already taken care of this privately, but for anyone else: Dr. Jewell is correct, but if you prefer to have this taken care of more in advance, just use our contact page: https://libertyclassroom.com/contact.
-
AuthorPosts