Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
woodsParticipant
Even if such people were right about the text of the Second Amendment, the right to bear arms would still be protected under the Ninth Amendment, which protects customary rights not enumerated elsewhere. The right to bear arms was such a right for Englishmen.
woodsParticipantScott Trask has a paper on this: http://mises.org/journals/scholar/trask1.pdf
woodsParticipantAlso, these online resources, right here at Liberty Classroom:
woodsParticipantI have seen these statements quoted in H. Newcomb Morse, “The Foundations and Meaning of Secession,” Stetson Law Review 15, 2 (1986), 419-36. If you’re at a university you should be able to get this article via interlibrary loan. Wish I could point you to a more convenient source.
Now opponents of secession will claim that these statements by these states amount simply to an acknowledgment of the right of revolution. This is the way the Straussians deal with these passages. This isn’t secession, they say, which in their view is an absurdity. It is simply a restatement of the Lockean principle that people may overthrow oppressive governments,
woodsParticipantI don’t know anything about the history of this river, but I agree completely that property rights solve these problems.
woodsParticipantIt might not be possible, unless you have an unusually educated, alert, and morally serious population. This goes to show the dangers of the state in any form, in my opinion.
woodsParticipantI have not encountered this. Joe Salerno, in his book Money: Sound and Unsound, is critical of the attenuated gold standard of the 1920s.
Can you be more specific about which “deflationary policies” you are thinking of?
You may find this page helpful: https://libertyclassroom.com/depression.
woodsParticipantSorry about that; it was an oversight. It’s up now at https://libertyclassroom.com/live.
woodsParticipantI don’t know of any such legal challenges. You might find some interesting material in this useful article: http://mises.org/daily/3553
woodsParticipantHere are my thoughts on your questions:
(1) An inflation of prices would occur as a result of monetizing silver. It would be the same effect as a sudden, massive discovery of gold.
(2) Yes, presumably Foner has in mind the federal government’s lack of interest in Greenback or silver schemes.
(3) Foner is way off here, if we’re not taking him out of context. Homestead did not become nonunion until after the strike. The strike was about wages. I recommend the article by Charles Baird, linked on the Populism lecture page.
woodsParticipantCheck out this article by Kevin: http://www.lewrockwell.com/gutzman/gutzman12.html
woodsParticipantIn the past, Kevin has recommended A Son of Thunder as a biography of Patrick Henry.
woodsParticipantI second Brion’s recommendation of the book by Gamble. I haven’t read that particular title, but I suspect it’s an expansion of chapter 1 of The War for Righteousness, Gamble’s book on the American clergy and World War I. That chapter traces the American exceptionalism idea throughout U.S. history.
woodsParticipantI second Brion’s recommendation of the book by Gamble. I haven’t read that particular title, but I suspect it’s an expansion of chapter 1 of The War for Righteousness, Gamble’s book on the American clergy and World War I. That chapter traces the American exceptionalism idea throughout U.S. history.
woodsParticipantI don’t know that the definitive book on W has been written. The two-volume Neo-Conned series has some great material on the war in Iraq.
-
AuthorPosts