Viewing 2 posts - 1 through 2 (of 2 total)
  • Author
  • #21508


    What is the Austrian critique of the claim that it would have been the equivalent of the Norman Invasion if we hadn’t bailed out the banks that engaged in the speculative mania before the 08 crisis?

    Thank you


    The main point is that when its know that government will offer a bailout to banks, it generates moral hazard. Banks do not face the full consequences of profligate lending and therefore, engage in speculative mania.

    Furthermore, bankruptcies have the salutary effect of transferring resources from failed entrepreneurs to successful entrepreneurs. Bailouts are counterproductive to the restoration of efficient resource use. They subsidize inefficient entrepreneurs.

    Bank financing makes up less than 1/4 of all capital funding in the world economy. Even a collapse of banking would hardly dry up all capital funding.

Viewing 2 posts - 1 through 2 (of 2 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.