Marxist theory is good but does not work in practice

Viewing 2 posts - 1 through 2 (of 2 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #17564
    rt
    Member

    Today in civics course, we were going through the electoral process in my country and mentioned the different political parties. Regarding the Communists she said:
    “Marxism/Communism in theory is not reprehensible, but in practice it doesn’t work.”

    When people talk about marxist theory, they often think of a utopian world where everyone is equal and gets along. “From each according to his ability, to each according to his need” This sounds so paradise-like, it’s wishful thinking. I don’t think it should be considered a theory.

    But Marx supports violence against the capitalists in order to form a proletarian dictatorship. He favors the forceful nationalization of capital and industry. In the communist society he envisions, there’s no private property and economic inequality. Isn’t this the actual theory, people should refer to if they want to talk about the theory?
    Here I can find lots of reprehensible ideas!

    What do you think? Is marxist theory “nice” or good? And can a theory be good if it doesn’t work in practice?

    #17565
    jmherbener
    Participant

    Rothbard said that we should reject out of hand any inconceivable state of affairs as a goal for human beings and that any move toward such a goal should also be rejected.

    http://library.mises.org/books/Murray%20N%20Rothbard/Egalitarianism%20as%20a%20Revolt%20Against%20Nature,%20and%20Other%20Essays.pdf

    And just so there’s no doubt about Rothbard’s view that communism is an inconceivable goal for human beings, here is Rothbard on Marx:

    http://mises.org/daily/3769

Viewing 2 posts - 1 through 2 (of 2 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.