Alright thank you! But he is credited with destroying the exploitation theory but couldn’t socialists concede BB’s point and argue that the pure entrepreneurial profit represents surplus-value which is due to exploitation?
Thus if the workers waited to get their full MRP or invested their wages, the final amount would still not amount to the difference between revenues and cost.
What is then in your opinion the best argument against the exploitation theory (in the case that marxists conceded BB’s argument).
